April 17, 2024, 09:54:13 PM

Author Topic: Hot Rod Magazine makes 1200HP on "junkyard" 4.8L... stock bottom end!  (Read 24668 times)

Offline mattster03

I was reading this article last night and figured I would share.  It was their intentention to build a 5.3L but ended up finding out it was a 4.8L.  :cheers:




Current Car: 1993 Mazda RX7 Touring, LS1/T56, Stock Stock Stock

1993 Mazda RX7 R1, LS1/T56, EPS 230/238, TSP Ported heads
10.826 @ 128 , 1.53 60' - SOLD

Feature Article - http://www.importmeet.com/blog/2012/03/29/best-of-both-worlds-v8rx7guys-ls1-swapped-1993-mazda-rx-7/
Swap Info - http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2801662

1986 Mazda RX7 GXL, LT1/T56 "Retired"
Swap Info - http://www.cardomain.com/ride/641869

Offline cool

Re: Hot Rod Magazine makes 1200HP on "junkyard" 4.8L... stock bottom end!
« Reply #1 on: August 22, 2011, 01:45:46 PM »
That set the bar pretty high for Speedfabs truck...

Offline wickedrx7

Re: Hot Rod Magazine makes 1200HP on "junkyard" 4.8L... stock bottom end!
« Reply #2 on: August 22, 2011, 01:46:45 PM »
Very cool.

1993 Touring, 2012 L99, T-56, Ronnin 8.8, Ohlins, Speedhut, Samberg and lots of custom parts
Build Thread - http://www.norotors.com/index.php?topic=19354.0
Pictures - www.flikr.com/wickedrx7

Offline thetastelingers

Re: Hot Rod Magazine makes 1200HP on "junkyard" 4.8L... stock bottom end!
« Reply #3 on: August 22, 2011, 02:10:02 PM »
That set the bar pretty high for Speedfabs truck...
Or a certain RX7 that is built on this site...
wazzaaaaaaaaaaaapppppp!

Offline forcefed86

Re: Hot Rod Magazine makes 1200HP on "junkyard" 4.8L... stock bottom end!
« Reply #4 on: August 22, 2011, 04:17:32 PM »
There are many rumoprs that the bore to stroke ratio of the 4.8 is more favorable to a boosted engine. Now they need to do the same test with teh same kit on an iron 5.3, 6.0, and LS1 and L33.

Offline mattster03

Re: Hot Rod Magazine makes 1200HP on "junkyard" 4.8L... stock bottom end!
« Reply #5 on: August 22, 2011, 04:22:15 PM »
There are many rumoprs that the bore to stroke ratio of the 4.8 is more favorable to a boosted engine. Now they need to do the same test with teh same kit on an iron 5.3, 6.0, and LS1 and L33.

that was my frustration with the article... i now need to see the results with the 5.3 and 6.0!  I also would have preferred they fix the 'ignition' failure and run it to mechanical failure as they promised.
Current Car: 1993 Mazda RX7 Touring, LS1/T56, Stock Stock Stock

1993 Mazda RX7 R1, LS1/T56, EPS 230/238, TSP Ported heads
10.826 @ 128 , 1.53 60' - SOLD

Feature Article - http://www.importmeet.com/blog/2012/03/29/best-of-both-worlds-v8rx7guys-ls1-swapped-1993-mazda-rx-7/
Swap Info - http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2801662

1986 Mazda RX7 GXL, LT1/T56 "Retired"
Swap Info - http://www.cardomain.com/ride/641869

Offline MPbdy

Re: Hot Rod Magazine makes 1200HP on "junkyard" 4.8L... stock bottom end!
« Reply #6 on: August 22, 2011, 04:38:33 PM »
The magazines are actually on a very tight budget now and do pay for the dyno time.  If they ran out of time, which I'm sure they did, they can't just come back another day.  There are a lot of runs there and a lot of data.  Its one of the better stories I've seen done in quite a while.

Offline forcefed86

Re: Hot Rod Magazine makes 1200HP on "junkyard" 4.8L... stock bottom end!
« Reply #7 on: August 22, 2011, 05:22:54 PM »
not to mention the engines condition before and after. Id like to get a mic reading before and after on the bearings after that. Its free to tear down the engine and inspect it!

Offline BeasTT

  • Supporting Member
  • Top Fuel
  • Posts: 5877
  • Twinz for teh winz
  • View Gallery
    • View Profile
Re: Hot Rod Magazine makes 1200HP on "junkyard" 4.8L... stock bottom end!
« Reply #8 on: August 22, 2011, 06:22:27 PM »
Their a2w's are shinier than mine :(
Nick Shultz

1993 Rx-7
371ci, Twin Billet 6265's, Twin A2W's, ProEFI 128, RacePak IQ3,
McLeod RXT, Speedfab 8.8 solid axle, QA1s, FIC 2150cc, Magnafuel 4303

Offline zbrown

Re: Hot Rod Magazine makes 1200HP on "junkyard" 4.8L... stock bottom end!
« Reply #9 on: August 22, 2011, 09:10:06 PM »
Very cool no matter how you look at it
8.50/165



Offline DavidPHumes

Re: Hot Rod Magazine makes 1200HP on "junkyard" 4.8L... stock bottom end!
« Reply #10 on: August 22, 2011, 09:12:42 PM »
Yeah, this is pretty awesome I'd say. I'd never do it in my own person car but it's not my  :bacon:
FC, L33, E85, TC76, 8.8" solid axle, 1.80 PG - Parted Out
NA Miata, FM coilovers, FM sway bars, Hard Dog roll bar, 949 subframe braces - Daily Driver

Offline forcefed86

Re: Hot Rod Magazine makes 1200HP on "junkyard" 4.8L... stock bottom end!
« Reply #11 on: August 22, 2011, 10:54:32 PM »
Not to mention those are those cheapo cxracing "Chinese" turbos. Seem to be working ok to me! 

http://www.cxracing.com/mm5/merchant.mvc?Screen=PROD&Store_Code=CXR&Product_Code=TRB-T76-P96-O&Category_Code=TOCH

Offline dark-one

Re: Hot Rod Magazine makes 1200HP on "junkyard" 4.8L... stock bottom end!
« Reply #12 on: August 24, 2011, 01:10:25 AM »
well shit maybe I need to just find a 4.8 liter  :scratch:

Offline 383mazda

Re: Hot Rod Magazine makes 1200HP on "junkyard" 4.8L... stock bottom end!
« Reply #13 on: August 24, 2011, 10:54:08 PM »
Hmm... so should I gap my rings larger before I put my motor in?  BTW the CXRacing / chinese turbos are good other than the piston rings - they like to fail quickly - rebuilding with good garrett rings would cost you less than $20, but you do need a way to put it back together and make sure it's balanced...
'86 GXL
For now: 383ci, Q-jet carb, vortec heads, 2004r tranny, NA rear = 305 wrhp
Sitting in my garage: LQ4, LS6 intake, Ported LS1 TB, TII rear end
On the wish list still: TC76, engine lift and warm weather!

atomicsix

  • Guest
Re: Hot Rod Magazine makes 1200HP on "junkyard" 4.8L... stock bottom end!
« Reply #14 on: August 24, 2011, 11:55:59 PM »
Hmm... so should I gap my rings larger before I put my motor in?  BTW the CXRacing / chinese turbos are good other than the piston rings - they like to fail quickly - rebuilding with good garrett rings would cost you less than $20, but you do need a way to put it back together and make sure it's balanced...

Probably depends on the power output you are going after. We have been well over 650 to the rear wheels with no regapping.

Standard gap on a mid nine run, and standard gap on some low nine runs with E85. These cars were all 3200lb to 3500 lb weight.